What I would like to see is a way to access the next or previous "element" in a list independent of the repeat structure. We have something similar in the offset function --offset (findString,searchString,skipChars). The key is to have a concept for a pointer of sorts. The pointer in the offset function is the skipChars parameter. You could just about simulate this capability using the offset function (not tested):

global gStringName,gStringNamePtr
function nextItemStringName --don't want to pass the actual strings
    get offset(itemDel(), gStringName, gStringNamePtr)
    if it = 0 then --delimiter not found, must be end of string
return char gStringNamePtr to -1 of gStringName --last item in the string, or empty
    else
return char gStringNamePtr to gStringNamePtr +it-1 of gStringName --grab the next item put it+1 into gStringNamePtr --advance the pointer to after the delimiter
    end if
end nextItemStringName

Of course this way of doing it is not so general, a bit awkward, and the function calls would kill a lot of the potential speed. That is why a built-in function would be much better. Perhaps a syntax something like this:

nextItem(stringName,charOffsetVar)

The variable name specified for the charOffsetVar would have the pointer that gets modified.

You could also make it a command something like:

nextThing stringName with charOffsetVar by item

Having sequential access methods like this would allow a much greater freedom to process one or more lists at the same time without suffering the usual speed penalties.

Dennis

On Jun 28, 2005, at 8:08 AM, Robert Brenstein wrote:

When it comes to the 'each element' form, you are right that it is ambiguous at first glance, but would seem reasonable that sorting applies to the elements themselves since keys are not explicitly entering the picture. To get sorting on keys we would need to say

  repeat for each line tKey in the keys of myArray ascending



Oops. My thinking went a bit astray. What you are talking about is more like

  repeat for each element foo of fooArray ascending by key of each

Robert
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to