I'm afraid I can't see how to call it not a bug.
Let me put it another way. If I want all text in a field that doesn't
have a specified font to be in the owner's font -- isn't that the
whole idea of inheritance? -- then why should that _font_ setup be
overridden by a _style_ setting? That is, why would Rev insist on
inserting a <font> tag in the htmlText rather than using the for
example <a> and </a> tags and leaving the font alone? (Linking font
and size makes sense, I think; linking font and style doesn't.)
Isn't this problem going to arise with any stack that's meant to run
on more than one platform, for example?
Or to put it yet another way: don't mean to be obstreperous, but how
to I work around this "feature"?
Charles Hartman
On Jul 8, 2005, at 11:32 AM, Eric Chatonet wrote:
Hi Charles,
Rev has a weird behaviour we discussed on this list a long time ago:
If the font is the owner's font and the size the owner's size ,
there are no problem.
But once you have changed the size or the style of such a chunk,
the font of this chunk is no longer the owner's font (empty) but
the *effective* owner's font.
If I remember correctly, this is not a bug but falls within a
runRev choice that we do regret.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
