Could you make use of the split command somehow? You would have to
format your lists a little differently, but if you did it right and
specified a primary and secondary delimiter, you might be able to get
quick results and still take advantage of the intersect command.
Anyway, just another idea.
Chris Sheffield
On Jul 8, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Dennis Brown wrote:
Eric,
Yes, I looked at the intersect command, but it performs the action
on the keys not the data from a list. I would have to create an
array element for each integer in the list with the integer as the
key. Sounded like two loops that would run even slower than my
example:
repeat for each item theItem in list1
put empty into myArray1[theItem]
end repeat
repeat for each item theItem in list2
put empty into myArray2[theItem]
end repeat
intersect myArray1 with myArray2
if the keys of myArray1 is empty then get false else get true
In actual practice, the above example runs 3 times slower than the
below example for the sample data shown.
However, knowing that Rev had such a command for the keys, I
thought perhaps someone knew of a more clever way to use it, or
maybe there was another way to intersect data.
Dennis
------------------------------------------
Chris Sheffield
Read Naturally
The Fluency Company
http://www.readnaturally.com
------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
