Jon,

But that is exactly the point. WHO will do this work and WHERE should it be put and in What context. Rev has been slowly making the docs better and it is still a work in progress. They are also trying the online conference thing with attached sample stacks (which is great). But this amount of work will definitely interfere with bug fixes and enhancement requests at the present time. They have started to implement a user editable area in the docs for user contribution on specific doc items but it still needs work.

Where as a WIKI would be nice but people have already tried that and stalled in the effort. Besides a WIKI on some ones website besides Revs is not a good idea in the long run since that person might move or die or whatever and the effort is then lost. So Who, What and Where are the critical issues if this is to ever get done. It needs to be always accessible and monitored and formatted for correctness let alone be updated as changes are made to Transcript.

Don't get me wrong I would love to see these:
1.) Extra examples in the existing docs (from different points of view - with different possible usages) .
2.) Sample stacks with existing code to make these examples work.
3.) A truly 'for beginners only' tutorial for the Rev application and interface and lastly 4.) A series of working Concept stacks that show the most integral parts of Transcript and how it can be used.

Personally, I would like to see RevOnline expanded to host strictly pre-formated user submitted solution stacks that have gone through REV's seal of approval and hosted there and accessible from within Rev itself. This would be different from the user area where the strictness would not exist since many times that is to share a work in progress and get feedback. The format could be 'very' close to the format used in the online conference stacks.

So if enough volunteers are available to write/contribute to these pre-formated stacks AND Rev is agreeable to host the space and provide the links in the RevOnline area then we could start to work on what types of solution/ideas are needed the most at this time. Then people could start working on them and this might get done. Other wise it becomes all 'talk'.

Yours,

Tom

On Jul 25, 2005, at 9:37 PM, Jon wrote:

Whether this belongs in the "docs" or in something else is beside the point. If I'm struggling with how to use a REPEAT, I need examples.


Macintosh PowerBook G-4 OSX 10.3.9, OS 9.2.2, 1.25 GHz, 512MB RAM, Rev 2.6


Advanced Media Group
Eagle Works Art & Sculpture
Semantic Compaction Systems
Prentke Romich Company
Prentke Romich International
SCIconics, LLC
Artist
Thomas J McGrath III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to