Why does the alt id need to be an integer? And it should be addressed in this form: Field altID xyz not file ID xyz
Would you guys agree? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Gaskin Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 4:25 PM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: set rect of fld f1 of cd c1 of wd w1 to rect of fld f2 of cdc2 of wd w2 Dick Kriesel wrote: > On 8/26/05 11:49 AM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>I think altID is the way to go because it also lets you reference things >>numerically > > <snip> > >>b) Valid ID numbers go up to 2 billion > > > Valid altID numbers go up to only 65535. > > create button > repeat with i = 65535 to 65537 > set the altID of it to i > put the altID of it & cr after msg > end repeat > > The above puts the following: > > 65535 > 0 > 1 > > I could not find a BugZilla entry about altID. Does anyone else think there > should be one? Should it be a bug report or an enhancement request? Excellent catch, Dick. I had no idea that the altID would use a completely different scheme from the ID. I would think that would be an enhancement request, and given the number of people who would use it (you, me, and Jonathan) I think we can guess when it would be implemented. ;) -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation __________________________________________________ Rev tools and more: http://www.fourthworld.com/rev _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
