I, for one, hope it doesn't dissapear, as I use 'delete stack' quite
often. It's the only sure-fire way to make sure a stack is closed, and
I'd have to rewrite many, many stacks if it went away.
It's unfortunately named, and could certainly use a better synonym. But
it does 'delete a stack from memory' as it says. Once you get the hang
of it, and know to never use it on subStacks, it's not too bad.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I gave it five votes as well - with the understanding that there would
be one comprehensive solution that would address both bugs. It would be
welcome news to learn that "destroyStack" had disappeared with the next
version of Rev.
Paul Looney
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
