Richard wrote:
> If the user encounters annoyances before the utility of the
> work is self-evident, one can harldy blame them for simply
> moving on with their busy day.
MisterX replied:
> But Richard,
>
> You miss the point that one can only do so much testing and
> still depend lots on the user's feedback
MisterX later wrote:
> Monsieurx.com is being revamped silently into Wiki and
> without the wacky MisterX's adventure content.
>
> You can come and preview the website at http://monsieurx.com/wiki
Which earned these replies:
> Link seems broken ;-/
> Yep, I can see it, but can't navigate anywhere.
> I get "Login Error" everywhere.
The point of my original post was that sufficient testing must be done
by the developer to ensure that bugs are encountered AFTER the user is
aleady hooked.
Who missed the point?
There is a ratio of bugs to understandable usefulness. Raise that
quotient for TAOO and its adoption rate will change.
If that level of effort doesn't seem worthwhile to you, you may have to
be content shipping commercialy successfuly software at a rate that
leave the rest of us in the dust.
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
