that's possible! but forth wasn't in mind though I did try long ago a forth language on my first mac named Neon... If anyone remembers it!
cheers Xavier > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Mark Wieder > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 1:01 AM > To: How to use Revolution > Subject: FORTH > > Dennis- > > Sunday, October 16, 2005, 9:58:04 AM, you wrote: > > > to Forth. Forth is a low level but extensible language and IDE from > > Forth? (Running over to x's web site to check it out...) > Forth is as close to the metal as you can get without writing > in ones and zeros. > > > One of the weaknesses of XTalk/Transcript in my opinion was > that you > > could not directly and efficiently extend the language in > this same way. > > XTalk would be more on the path to Forthness if we could > overload keywords and add new ones. Of course, that would > probably also require namespaces and an include mechanism. > Imagine patching "trunc" so that it does the right thing by: > > function trunc pValue > return trunc(pValue & "") > end trunc > > -- > -Mark Wieder > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage > your subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
