Ken- Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 10:28:36 AM, you wrote:
> Actually, it *should* support the full form of PCRE, since that is the > library that was used when the put it into the engine. The bugs you identify > above are all enhancement requests, so they are not representative of actual > bugs with the engine - in fact the only other two bugs I could find were > related to docs and not PCRE support at all. > So AFAICT we have a full and complete PCRE implementation here, with no > 'real' bugs associated with it. Well, my BZ #2805 was filed as an enhancement because I realize that runrev implements *some* of the regular expression characters in the filter command, but not all. I realize the matchText function handles more of them, but whether this inconsistency is a bug or an enhancement request is a matter of semantics. If the engine implements the full PCRE set but I can't get to it using the syntax that the builtin commands will accept, it doesn't do much good from a scripting perspective. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
