Mark,
We did find today that Constellation needs to put a "ghost
breakpoint" (one the user can't see) after "try". I do that now with
a bunch of situations where the engine wants to "step out" but the
user has indicated "step over". We'll just have to crate more ghosts.
After all, it's nearly Halloween!
Jerry
http://www.daniels-mara.com/products/constellation.htm
Scripts and properties in a tabbed editor!
On Oct 26, 2005, at 5:03 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 12:06 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 1:56 PM, Mark Talluto wrote:
On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:19 AM, Charles Hartman wrote:
There is a checkbox in Constellation that needs to be checked
called: into. Make sure it is checked for it to work as
expected.
?? I don't want to step into; I want to step over. What I don't
want to do is run.
Sorry about that. I guess I did not read very well. Would
putting a breakpoint after the line you wish to step over work
for you?
Yes, that does work. The failure of "step" to behave right isn't
an unsolvable dilemma. It's just that "step" exists for the sake
of saving that labor of setting _two_ (or more) breakpoints every
time you want to watch closely what happens in a short sequence of
lines.
I totally get it Charles. As in other areas of life, one must use
workarounds until something changes. All in all, it is minor
compared the problems that have been solved by Constellation.
Mark Talluto
--
CANELA Software
http://www.canelasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
