Yup, I also agree. When reading a comment, we need to be able to refer back to the original text that is commented upon.
Here is an example of what such a page would look like - this entry is for the altID function: http://www.seedwiki.com/wiki/runtime_revolution_docs/altid_property.cfm? wpid=213569 And before anyone asks - no, that site is not meant to be the official thing (unless it becomes the only option) - just meant to be used as an example to whet appetites. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troy Rollins Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:51 PM To: How to use Revolution Subject: Re: Revdocs on a wiki On Oct 27, 2005, at 2:23 PM, Mark Swindell wrote: > Using the existing docs as a starting point would be optimal, in my > view. Exactly, otherwise there will be a wiki with many blank or placeholder pages which cannot completely support the user's inquiries - which ultimately results in a tool which is not used. It would also be best if each page in the official documentation could link directly to the wiki page for the same term or item. If you can't easily get to the information from within the Rev environment there will be far less users of the system. -- Troy RPSystems, Ltd. http://www.rpsystems.net _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
