Hi,

You could also put the mouse up handler in the group and change it slightly as so:

on mouseUp
put theArray[the name of the target] into myValue
put DoMouseUpInRect(the name of the target,myValue) into myResult
end mouseUp

All the Best
Dave


Thanks Dave

That I will do. Really useful.

Jan
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Burgun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "How to use Revolution" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: More efficent checking of multiple objects

Hi,

Here's something I did that you may be able to adapt. In my case they objects are rectangles and the label/name field is not displayed. Also all that needed to happen was if the rectangle was clicked, an action specific to that rectangle had to be performed. To do this I did the following:

Setup an array that has the key being the (long) name of the button and the data as the value of being an object-specific field.

If the user re-ordered the rects all that needed to be done was to swap the data field of the Array between objects, e.g.

Given the following Rectangle List:

R1,R2,R3,R4,R5,

The Array would look like this:

"R1",VALUE1
"R2",VALUE2
"R3",VALUE3
"R4",VALUE4
"R5",VALUE5

if user changes the position so that R5 comes after R2

R1,R2,R5,R3,R4,

"R1",VALUE1
"R2",VALUE2
"R3",VALUE5  <-----
"R4",VALUE3
"R5",VALUE4

So all that is done is to move VALUE5 into R3, VALUE3 into R4 and VALUE4 into R5.

Then in the mouseUp handler for each rectangle:

on mouseUp
put theArray[the name of me] into myValue
put DoMouseUpInRect(the name of me,myValue) into myResult
end mouseUp

You could do the same using custom properties for each object, but I found this harder to maintain and debug.

Don't know if this would help in your case, but maybe you can adapt the idea.

All the Best
Dave

Dear Jan,

I use a repeat with T=1 to (the number of buttons of group "Timeline")
because I need to reorganize all the other buttons if the user moves just one of them.

In the future the user can have up to 1000 of these buttons in the timeline. At this point I guess the repeat loop will be very slow.

Is there a more efficient method I can use here?

If the user eliminates or changes button x, is there any need to adjust buttons 1 through (x-1)? If not, you can start T=X to (the number of buttons of group "Timeline". It won't help much if the target is button 1; but it should help lots if the target is button 999.

If the relationship of the buttons is different such that action on button x can require changes to buttons 1 to (x-1), I'd need to know more to offer further suggestions.

Rob Cozens, CCW
Serendipity Software Company

Vive R Revolution!
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to