Alex Tweedly wrote:
Marty Knapp wrote:
I've been tinkering with this a bit and wanted to ask a few more
questions. Again, my data set is 8 items with all but one being a
number. I need to be able to select a subset by analysing 1 or more
of these items. My current data set is approx 128,000 records. When I
filter the data on the item that contains words, it's pretty fast -
about 1 second (I have an old Mac G4-single processor 867mgz, and
running Rev 2.2.1) The speed is exactly the same whether I use the
above method or just 'filter theData with "*word*"'
That seems terribly slow to me :-)
That's what I thought! Interestingly enough in my repeat for each loop I
had "set cursor to busy" and that's what was bring this thing to its
knees. I knew that a progress indicator was a hog, but had no idea that
this would take such a heavy toll. Searches that were running 5 minutes
now take about 5 seconds. That still isn't terribly fast - maybe my
older computer is to blame? Are there any speed improvements between the
current version of Rev and mine (2.2.1)?
Here's a line from my data: 61187,digital camera
driver,1.18,3219,3450000,1071,4,9.1
And a typical repeat loop:
repeat for each line theLine in sourceData
if item 7 of theLine >50 and item 8 of theLine >2 then put theLine &
return after allResults
end repeat
Marty
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
