On Nov 16, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Alex Tweedly wrote:
Geoff Canyon wrote:
Bother -- it happened again. First we had repeat for each turning
up faster than the filter command. Now I've done a test on the
following, and it looks like the split command takes not quite
twice as long as repeat for each (when repeat for each is handled
the following way).
I wonder if this is because the "split" method used a secondary
delimiter (numtochar(3)) which doesn't exist in the data. (Nothing
to do with the choice of secondaryDelimiter - you need to pick one
that isn't in the data).
That's what I suspect.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
