Jim Ault wrote:
After all the volumes of mail and comments about the Rev team, I would like
to hear a few terse, concise, and pithy remarks from those in the know (I am
not one of them) that rate the progress since Monterey last June. Many
commitments were made in good faith at the conference. Hopefully most have
been met and more in the works.
One could break down the positions presented by RunRev at Monterey into
two groups:
- an earnest interest in fixing bugs
- some proprietary feature proposals presented with the understanding
that they were under non-disclosure.
Version 2.6.1 demonstrates a strong effort on the former, with several
dozen bugs squashed (70+?) and a couple of nifty "feature completion"
enhancements.
The latter cannot be commented on here, of course.
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
