Richmond, I agree with you.
Mathewson wrote:
Framkly software should be either FREE (and any proprietary elements within FREE software items should be 'bound up' in such a way that to reverse engineer them would take such a long time that it would be counterproductive) or UNFREE (as in, totally bound up in legla clauses cooked up by highly paid lawyers). FREE software shouldn't need any licenses - Creative Commons, GNU, Rampantly Oversexed Wrathog, or what ever. FREE means FREE. So those of us interested in producing FREE software should get on and produce it; and include a nice little READ ME document that says something rather like: "This is FREE, do with it what you like" and those of us who are interested in producing software for which they want money should get on and produce it; and include blatant signals that it is UNFREE. Blast licences!
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
