On 23 Nov 2005, at 12:36, Marielle Lange wrote:
Likewise, I don't believe commercial developers are a threat to the open source movement. So why not change the license to Share alike rather than Share alike-Non commercial?
Thanks for the comments - i agree. I have no real strong opinion on which flavour of open license to use. That is a separate debate. i think you can build good business models around any of them. I posted the license as an example - and to raise what I consider to be important legal questions regarding the use of content posted to this list. This is something I have always thought should be clarified by RunRev - and hopefully done so as part of a well thought out open content strategy).
Anyway for my part - there is nothing more I can add to this topic. I will do my best to support any clearly licensed open content initiative supported by this community. _______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
