David Bovill wrote:
1) Lack of the large number of professional grade commercial plugins or open source libraries available compared to other platforms (this seems to be changing slowly).

They're out there, just poorly cataloged. RunRev currently only lists components they resell, and the DMOZ index contains only a slender subset of what's available:
<http://dmoz.org/Computers/Programming/Languages/Transcript/>


    2) Slowly deteriorating *nix support (hopefully to be remedied  soon).

Relative to ROI, I can't argue with them there. How many folks on this list are using IRIX?

3) Lack of open source strategy - not helping with contracts or to fix 2) and 3) above.

I hope I never see the day when RunRev takes resources away from product development to start hiring lawyers to do legal consulting.

RunRev's license seems very clear to me, and I don't expect them to assist me with negotiating my own contracts with my clients.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Managing Editor, revJournal
 _______________________________________________________
 Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to