On 11/28/05 7:33 AM, "David Burgun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If that isn't a bug *and* a limitation then I'd like to know what you > would consider a bug!!! Well, a "bug" is a behavior that is contrary to what the code is supposed to do in that situation. So the fact that Rev keeps "internal" groups that have no representation is not a bug if that was the way it was designed, regardless of whether you like it or not, or whether the community likes it or not. The App Browser, since it is written in Rev, displays things for a stack that are on cards, but doesn't (currently) show any unplaced groups that the stack possesses. This is why Geoff called it a "limitation" - the App Browser should probably show this, but just because it doesn't show it doesn't mean it's a bug either. Remember the definition of a "bug" above - if the App Browser was *supposed* to show unplaced groups and *didn't*, then that would be a bug. However, regardless of whether this is a bug or limitation, I feel something should be done to address it so that this situation doesn't happen again. Just my 2 cents, Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
