"Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:... > Well for reasons I may not be aware of, all the new commands seem to be in > the format, "revDoSomething" followed by parameters. Example: > > revAddXMLNode treeID, parentPath, nodeName, nodeContents > > the official example: > > revAddXMLNode 9,"/","Balls","" > > Why couldn't you say something like > > add node "Balls" to the root path of XML tree id 9 > > I'm not saying that is the exact perfect syntax, nor is it "compact," but > it would be super readable/self-documenting and easy to remember. This is > what I mean about advancing TransScript. > > Bill > > [Oh yeah, reason #15: Inability to copy and paste from the documentation > stack!] > > "Mark Wieder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Bill- >> >> Thursday, December 1, 2005, 7:47:19 PM, you wrote: >> >>> 14) Not advancing the HyperTalk (Transcript) language further. New >>> features >>> tend to come in the form of functions instead of English-language stuff >>> that >>> makes this language a joy to use. The code is looking more and more like >>> JavaScript (ugh). >> >> I'm intrigued by this. Can you explain this one for me? Are you >> referring to adding new keywords to the language, adding new syntax, >> or what? What would you look for that isn't currently available? >> >> -- >> -Mark Wieder >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> use-revolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> > >
_______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
