Dennis, if I recall correctly HyperCard used to let one script something like "go to the background of this card" or something much shorter but more cryptic such as "go bg this cd". Not sure about the syntax, but my point is that HyperTalk was very forgiving.
Is Transcript similarly forgiving? --- Dennis Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2005, at 4:30 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: > > > Problem 3: <warning - heresy follows> there's no > such thing as > > "self-documenting, human-readable code". Sorry - > that's the way it is. > > Xtalk comes pretty close, though. Even comes > pretty close to > > "human-thinkable". > > Even though Transcript is pretty verbose, I find > that I need to add > 25-50% more characters as comments to be able to go > back and figure > out what I wrote easily. I don't see how it is > possible to have the > what convey the why, and even the what need some > help now and then. > > Dennis > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and > manage your subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > __________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
