I generally code my stacks using a fairly English-like code . . . I have downloaded other people's stacks and found that they have achieved similar results to what I have achieved using extremely un-English-like syntax.
I understand from this: 1. Some people prefer to code in English-like syntax (maybe those with an HC background), 2. Some people prefer to code in a more "programming-code" sort of syntax (maybe those coming from elsewhere), 3. RR is 'BIG' enough to cater for both types of people - and that is really fantastic. I have a hell of a time trying to understand stacks written by coders of type 2: but then they didn't write those stacks for my benefit - it is up to me if I want to understand them. As long as RR can go on catering to both types of coders it will remain fantastic - if it starts to tend towards one end of the spectrum it will, obviously, lose those at the other end - and the user-base would suffer: and that would lead to an impoverishment all round. sincerely, Richmond __________________________________________________ See Mathewson's software at: http://members.maclaunch.com/richmond/default.html _______________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------- The Think Different Store http://www.thinkdifferentstore.com/ For All Your Mac Gear --------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
