I disagree with this premise (okay, obviously): It is tantamount to group-think. It presents the company with a skewed perception of the reality and totality of its actual as well as potential user base. And it sets up a class-based system of users, with the 'pro's' being higher beings than everybody else (even though some may not see themselves that way--am I not going out of my way to qualify each and every statement?).
People don't always 'criticize' because they hate something; sometimes they do it because they love it and want to see it thrive (I don't think you and I are of a strikingly different mind on this, incidentally). But again -- these sorts of discussions nearly ALWAYS percolate out of a technical or 'use' issue. That's why establishing n extra groups won't likely achieve what some say they want. Judy On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Marielle Lange wrote: > > Part of 'using' (in terms of the use-list) Rev really does > > encompass why what's there isn't useful. > > My point of view too. <snip> > You will have noticed that the > professional users, in contrast, tend to express good to high levels > of satisfaction. We are free to do whatever we want. But we are not > necessarily free to do it right in front of the nose of persons who > said they were not interested in this kind of discussion/initiatives. > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
