Dan's earlier suggestion seem eminently simple
"OT:"
works for me... I can't deal with more than one mailing list.
Setting aside rancorous flames which need to be curtailed, sometimes
its very important for us to get outside the code and look at the big
picture. Especially if we are part of a team that must help make
important strategic long term decisions. We work on 3-year, six- year
planning cycles in our publications field. I find it really helpful
to "let fly" on "blue sky" discussion about where all this should be
going...
Why not here, if it is clean healthy exchange of insights?
if you just want to stay in the code trenches... filter "OT:" to the
trash or any thread that is irrelevant. Of course you should be using
a mail client that organizes by thread...
skts
On Dec 13, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
Fair enough, Mark. Where should they be, then?
On 12/11/05, Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These discussions are quite interesting, but IMHO this is not the
place for them, since they do interfere with the actual utility of
the list.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author
http://www.shafermedia.com
Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought"
From http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
