Hi Tom,
Don't worry, your behaviour on this list and on the RRgraphix list
has always been exemplar. There was nothing wrong with your "Warning
email".
Take care,
Marielle
PS. What's the purpose of a [RRgraphix] list if we get to read all
threads here?
Hello all listers,
I had an experience with a sample stack that at first threw me off
and I may have responded to the what the stack did harshly. I'm not
sure. But it brought up a point for me.
Is it considered good form to point out how someone's hard worked
stack performs if it does so in such an unexpected way (like the
stack that moved my menu's did but did not put them back)? In other
words if someone makes a stack that does something 'wrong' or 'bad'
in my opinion, would it be considered an insult or attack OR should
it be considered a critigue simply on the stack or code and be
considered a positive thing?
I try to take any advise or critique as a positive thing but
sometimes I feel slighted. I was wondering how others felt about this.
P.S. The stack in question was a good stack and showed some
interesting things that could be done with RR but I was not ready
for it to move my menu's and not put them back. That does not take
away from the intent of the sample.
Yours,
Tom
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Marielle Lange (PhD), Psycholinguist
Alternative emails: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage
http://homepages.lexicall.org/mlange/
Easy access to lexical databases http://lexicall.org
Supporting Education Technologists http://
revolution.lexicall.org/wiki
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
