Jerry Muelver wrote:
I see. Well, in 24 years of computing, I've never, until the G3, even SEEN a keyboard with both Enter and Return keys. The distinction must be a "Mac" thing.

It's a bit older than that, for those of us who remember typewriters. :)

The Return key was labeled as such more than a century ago, a reference to the paper carriage returning to the left side of the typewriter so the writer can begin a new line.

The Enter key is a new construct introduced with computers. It's placed away from the traditional keys, down by the numeric keypad with the other recent keyboard additions unique to computing.

Each key generates a different key code.

So these keys are not the same, neither in their origin nor their current resulting key code.

Yet PC manufacturers label these two different keys as if they are the same.

Why make one thing and label it something else?

Beats me.

All I know is that it's been this way for so long among PC manufacturers that many application designers have had to treat both Return and Enter as snynomous in terms of user gestures.

But as Jacque pointed out, this isn't always the case. Some use Enter for entering (confirming) input, while reserving Return for advancing to the next line.

What the software designer does with these keys will depend on the context in which they're used.

As far as Rev goes, as long as the keyboard generates different codes for each key it seems reasonable to maintain a distinction between them in Transcript's messages. If the software designer wants to treat them as synonymous they're only three lines away from doing so:

on returnKey
  enterKey
end returnKey


--
 Richard Gaskin
 Managing Editor, revJournal
 _______________________________________________________
 Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to