Chipp- Thursday, January 5, 2006, 12:26:55 PM, you wrote:
> I'm wondering why you're using backScripts instead of library stacks? I > can understand using frontScripts, but backScripts are limited in number > vs library stacks (outside development), and IMO typically reserved for > 1) scripts of objects other than stacks; (see libURL) > 2) runtime when you know you'll never exceed the max number of > backScripts (10) I just posted a longer reply to Dick's response. I *am* using library scripts now. I couldn't get a substack to work as a library stack before, but now it's working. I think I just hadn't cleaned out memory properly and my message hierarchy was messed up. Jacque's trick of using "stack x of stack y" got me past that point. But now that you mention it, my understanding is that library stacks function like backscripts in that the go behind the mainstack, but that they're peered, so they have access to each others' handlers. I take it that real backscripts stay behind library stacks in the message hierarchy? -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
