Ruslan- Thursday, February 9, 2006, 1:28:53 PM, you wrote:
> Under proprietary may be you mean implementations of engines? No, I'm referring to syntactical differences and proprietary extensions. This is why XQuery was born, as an open-source standard to try to rein this in. > But this is not a problem. SQL also have standard. And many DBMS vendors > implement it. A twisty maze of winding SQL standards, each different. As they say, the nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. > Exists draft of XUpdate. ...and it's been a draft for some time, but it does seem to be the way xml updates are heading. But it seems to me that XUpdate (and XQuery, for that matter) was developed to do the sort of things people are doing with AJAX these days. -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
