kee nethery wrote:
To use the house analogy, the homeowner gave me instructions on how to
get into his house and get stuff I was supposed to be able to get. I
followed the homeowner's instructions and saw things that perhaps the
homeowner might not want me to see, but since I was following the
homeowner's instructions, I figured the news was public knowledge. All
this fuss could have been avoided if the homeowner had locked the door
that I had been told to use.
I do not see Richmond as a villain in this situation.
Okay, I see your point and I have been corrected in email too. When I
posted I didn't realize how easy it was to gain access to the site. I
apologize to Richmond for calling him unethical. Maybe he was just
thoughtless.
But just to extend the analogy, suppose I arrived at the home and found
the door lock broken with a sign over it "Please knock". Suppose I went
in anyway and accidentally saw the homeowner engaged in a private
activity. I hope I would back out quietly, and resist the impulse to
grab my videocamera.
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
