David,
I think it is not an issue about Laws or Rights or even when does a
hack go to far or if the site left him no choice but to cancel and
'see' the material. The issue was that he didn't stop there but
decided to copy and then paste that info to a public place. I think
it is a 'simple courtesy' that should be expected.
He may have a right to do it.
He may be legal in doing it.
He may have been innocent in doing it.
He may have meant no harm.
He may not have sinned.
But he didn't have the simple courtesy to keep it to himself but
rather spread it here instead.
I think it was a mistake he made and I also hope a simple apology to
REV should be sufficient to get him back on the list.
I would welcome him back.
FWIW
Tom
On Feb 15, 2006, at 9:04 AM, David Burgun wrote:
As far as I can see he exercised his right to free speech and
that's all. RunRev didn't like it presumably because they felt that
he owed them a debt of silence. How do other people feel about
this? Do you think you owe RunRev the right to be silent about this
kind of information when it is not secured safely?
Thomas J McGrath III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lazy River Software™ - http://www.lazyriversoftware.com
Lazy River Metal Art™ - http://www.lazyriversoftware.com/metal.html
Meeting Wear™ - http://www.cafepress.com/meetingwear
Semantic Compaction Systems - http://www.minspeak.com
SCIconics, LLC - http://www.sciconics.com/sciindex.html
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
