On 2/18/06 7:50 PM, "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Rossi wrote: >> Recently, Dave Cragg wrote: >>> One further way... >>> >>> get the customKeys["specialData"] of field 1 >> >> *THIS* is what I had in my mind of how it should work, but couldn't get the >> syntax right. Thanks very much Dave. > > Whoa. Never seen that before. > > I have mixed feelings about the syntax, wondering whether () might be > more appropriate than [] in that context. > > Has this been in the docs all these years and I've somehow missed it? I know what you mean! It *isn't* in the docs AFAICT, so it just goes to show you can certainly teach an old dog new tricks... (BTW: I'm the old dog, not you, Richard! On second thoughts...) ;-) Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Web site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
