At 7:04 PM -0800 2/18/2006, Scott Rossi wrote:
Why is it not possible to substitute 1 and 0 for true and false? Is this possible and I've just never seen it? Has no one ever needed this option?
It goes back to the way xTalks handle values. True and false are strings, not numbers (the constant true has value "true", and likewise for false). This is how boolean values are reported throughout the language, as the strings "true" or "false".
I suppose xTalks could special-case equalities by making the string "true" equal the string "1", and "false" equal "0", but it would be kind of opaque to scripters, I think. (Handy, but hard to understand.)
-- jeanne a. e. devoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jaedworks.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
