I don't recall this being hashed out and finished several times, Jacque. Maybe it's been resolved to YOUR satisfaction, but someone else raised the issue in another thread, so evidently at least some of us don't think the issue's been resolved.
Except of course this is all hypothetical BS because none of us gets to decide how RR implements this. And you have to admit it's more fun than 2.7 bashing. :-) On 2/24/06, J. Landman Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas McGrath III wrote: > > Nooooooooooooooooo not this again................ > > > > Why does he keep bringing this up? > > Got me. I thought we'd already finished this conversation several times. > I don't see the point of hashing it out all over again. > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dan Shafer, Information Product Consultant and Author http://www.shafermedia.com Get my book, "Revolution: Software at the Speed of Thought" >From http://www.shafermediastore.com/tech_main.html _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
