On 2/27/06 6:53 AM, "Thomas McGrath III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 01010011 01101111 01110010 01110100 01101001 01101110 01100111 > 00100000 01110100 01101000 01110010 01101111 01110101 01100111 > 01101000 00100000 01101100 01101001 01101110 01100101 01110011 > 00100000 01101111 01100110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 > 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 > 01110011 01100101 01111000 01111001 00100000 01100010 01110101 > 01110100 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110100 00100000 01110110 > 01100101 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110000 01110010 01101111 > 01100100 01110101 01100011 01110100 01101001 01110110 01100101 00101110 > I agree with all but your second point about formatting. Jim Ault Las Vegas > On Feb 27, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Scott Kane wrote: > >>> in octal on the face of the ``computer'' to initialise the ``boot- >>> loader'' so that the machine could get started. >> >> Sometimes I miss converting hex and oct into decimal. >> I started my professional career (as opposed to my teenage >> programming) programming Data Checker DTS cash registers. >> The "zero report" and comparing it to other master machines >> for the location of corruption (a common event in memory at >> that time) was so eloquent. <g> >> _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
