Hey, Thanks for your responses, but they don't quite work for my particular case. Putting get the result below the line where I call for the netrequest will work, but it would be extremely difficult to do because it is located in odd places all over in more than 40 stacks. Right now I am thinking of making a stack that will do it for me, but I was hoping there was an easier way.
On 3/3/06, Sarah Reichelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/4/06, Bridger Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I just made a giant switch from Hypercard to Revolution. In Hypercard > > networking we used "request thedata from program theComputer" to request > > data from across an appletalk network. In Revolution this didn't work > > anymore so we made a new command, "Netrequest" that serves the same > > function. "netrequest thedata,theComputer" The problem is that in > > Hypercard put the data into the it variable when it is done. Without > > changing the script in the card where it initiates the netrequest > command > > (such as in the card or a button), can I add something the to stack > script > > where the command is contained so it puts the result into the it > variable? > > > netrequest thedata,theComputer > get the result > -- "it" will now contain whatever was returned from the netrequest > handler. > > HTH, > Sarah > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
