I think you missed the point. I DO want the case statement to
progress without breaks because I want the variable theModifier to be
ALL of the modifier keys that are being pressed on keyDown. As I
understand it, case statements without breaks will do that. And it
still doesn't explain how I can end up with a Ctrl in theModifier
when only the shift key was being held down.
If anyone would please feel free to paste my snippet (previously
posted) into a stack and observe what happens, I'd be curious if it
were just me. I am after all going through a KVM switch and a USB hub.
Bob
WAIT. don't send a bug report yet...how is it working at all?
don't forget the BREAK statement in your SWITCH structure...
on keyDown theKey
local theModifier
put "" into theModifier
switch
case the optionKey is down
put "Opt " after theModifier
break -- <----------
case the CommandKey is down
put "Cmd " after theModifier
break -- <----------
case the shiftKey is down
put "Shft " after theModifier
break -- <----------
case the controlKey is down
put "Ctrl " after theModifier
break -- <----------
end switch
put char 1 to -1 of theModifier into theModifier
replace " " with "-" in theModifier
put theModifier && theKey
pass keyDown
end keyDown
Bob Sneidar
IT Manager
Logos Management
Calvary Chapel CM
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
