Makes sense.
An article in the New York Times this AM about creating a dual boot
system on your own probably forced Apple's hand. Better to do it
officially rather than risk having someone kill their system by doing
it wrong.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/05/technology/
techspecial4/05pogue.html?
ex=1144900800&en=b61d37f327433864&ei=5070&emc=eta1
My opinion.... Choosing boot options definitely not as valuable as
parallel systems with cut & paste, etc. even if you take a
performance hit.
Jim
On Apr 5, 2006, at 9:20 AM, Stephen Barncard wrote:
I'm sure there will be 50 third party hacks but the news was that
Apple offered this but what I thought was remarkable is that Apple
offered this.
A 3rd party is creating a virtualization system that will let you
run XP and OS X at the same time:
http://www.macnn.com/articles/06/04/04/virtualization.software/
At 11:05 AM 4/5/2006, you wrote:
Hey this is interesting....
CUPERTINO, California-April 5, 2006-Apple® today introduced Boot
Camp, public
--
stephen barncard
s a n f r a n c i s c o
- - - - - - - - - - - -
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
