Well, Marielle, I've been accused of it. Dan too, I'll bet. And the both of us in a single breath, I'll wager (I wonder just how many people avoid a forum in which the two of us reside; or me alone, for that matter).
Sometimes these things happen due to the differences between bodily-present communications and electronic communications (and sometimes because some of us present ourselves badly, like I am now at 1:30 a.m. my local time, after a hugh fight with foster-child that resulted in her being sent back "home")... and sometimes because some of us (like me, yup) couldn't find a diplomatic solution if it whupped our sorry @sses, er, whatever... And, yes, sometimes people say thing simply TO hurt a person, at a personal level. And I'm quite certain that I've said things that others have found were decidedly intended to hurt THE PERSON as opposed to the position. I am (most unlike me but currently) charitably of the position that, for the most part, these differences of opinion (as opposed to personality) CAN be resolved. But perhaps that's because I'm currently inclined to be a Pollyana who is not concurrently occupying the 'naughty stool'... @;-) Judy On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Marielle Lange wrote: > Any form of communication contains information. Things are never said > to hurt you, at a person level. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
