On 09/04/2006, at 17:44, Geoff Canyon wrote:
I think you and I are agreed: the software itself is bug free.
There seems to be debate over whether a bug in the code's context
-- requirements, the engine, the OS, etc. -- qualifies as a bug in
the software. I think it doesn't, but I can understand the point of
people who think that's a useless distinction. In fact I'm likely
to agree, but I still maintain that the code itself is bug free ;-)
It's funny that this all started as a joke, but I'm actually
experiencing this as we speak: the windowshade control I released.
I think the code is clean, but some people are having troubles with
it. I can't replicate their errors, and there are others using it
without troubles as well. Is there a context issue? Am I wrong that
the code is clean? I'm stuck trying to figure that out. <sigh>
As for my posts referring to your code, Geoff, I hoped I had made it
sufficiently clear already that I was using it as a jumping off point
to elaborate on the issues of what is a bug and differences in user
experiences, and nothing at all to do with your code which I
understood and accepted in the context in which you presented it.
cheers
David
As far as my programming prowess is concerned, I hope it takes more
than one line of code to judge that!
You are too modest <g>
LOL
regards,
Geoff
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
