On Sun Apr 9 ;2006, Richard Gaskin ambassador at fourthworld.com wrote:
If I read you correctly it's pretty much the same as yours -- I think. I'm using a standalone with a very simple stack attached to it only because I couldn't get the Rev runtime engine to run on its own. Did I understand you correctly that you've gotten the runtime engine to run by just renaming it to include ".exe"?
Yes - running for stacks dropped on it.
Hmmm..... Any such luck with the OS X runtime engine? -- Richard Gaskin
Sorry, no luck here. The analogous approach as in Windows would be to rename the "standalone" bundle with ".app", but that did not work or I could not achieve this, because the "app" does not show? I am using MacOS on a fairly regular basis, but lack the deeper insights of a Mac power user. The "stub" approach of course works as any standalone can be used as a basic player for dropping stacks on it and - at the same time - providing access to its embedded resources (dialogs, icons etc) for the dropped stack. The only thing you have to care for with creating such a player is to keep the standalone stack as (visually) small as possible as you probably did with your stub.
Regards, Wilhelm Sanke <http://www.sanke.org/MetaMedia> _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
