Richard,
A potential danger I see to this approach is if one of the duplicates had been edited. The routine would have to check for modification date (probably safe to keep the one most recently changed) - just not delete any apparent duplicates that have different edit dates?
Paul Looney

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: How to use Revolution <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:51:53 -0700
Subject: Re: Could Rev do this?

  Mark Swindell wrote: 
> In looking for a way to remove duplicates photos from iPhoto, I find > iPhoto Diet (free, but not up to date and partial in its > implementation) and iView Media (50.00). IPhoto surely should do > this on its own, but it doesn't.  > > So I was wondering if Rev were up to the task of being able to read > iPhoto catalogues, determine duplicates, and get rid of them for the > user. If so, it would be a great utility and maybe give Rev some
publicity. Way over my head, but for those that knows, who knows? 
 
Maybe not. I was thinking about the same problem here the other day, and wile I haven't written anything yet it occurred to me that Rev's MD5 function could probably be useful: you'd make a list of all the files, read each file into a variable and run the variable through MD5, and then any matching MD5 keys are likely duplicates. 
 
Anyone here see a weakness to that crude approach? 
 
-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Managing Editor, revJournal 
 _______________________________________________________ 
 Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com 
_______________________________________________ 
use-revolution mailing list 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: 
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution 

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to