On Apr 29, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Dan Shafer wrote:
But in searching the Web, I didn't find very much info on
SMIL that post-dated about 2002. In 2005, the W3C reved the spec to
2.1 but
nothing has happened since. Not sure all (or any) of those are
valid data points, but my take is that
SMIL is a frown. :-)
I found the same -- no SMIL "chatter" today, 2006 I was hoping
someone might "prove me wrong" as it seems a useful technology. Hmmm
that makes Revolution itself more alive than SMIL, one could as well,
deliver the same content media in a stack... it just would not be
playable on the web, but if as you say Firefox does not do SMIL, then
it's a mute point.
http://www.smilguide.com/forums/discussion/1
tells one man's view...
Sivakatirswami
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
