Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Sorts are non-destructive so you can just do sequential sorts and you
should get what you need e.g.
sort lines of fld "userTasks" by item 2 of each
sort lines of fld "userTasks" by item 15 of each
(or possibly the other way around).
As always operating on variables is faster than fields, so if the
"userTasks" field has a lot of data, it would be faster to put it into
a variable, sort the variable and then put it back into the field.
There is a way to do the custom sort function but I always forget it
and rely on Jacque to remind me :-) However in this case, I think it
is overkill.
I agree. Sequential sorts are better for this case. And if it helps, I
always have to look up my notes when I write a custom sort. ;)
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
