It seems like there is some funky math going on here. In looking at
things, after 100 * tDecimal into tNewDecimal, tNewDecimal contains 27
the trunc of 27 should be 27, not 26.
At 02:17 PM 5/19/2006, you wrote:
put 10.27 into tNumber
put the trunc of tNumber into tInteger
put tNumber - tInteger into tDecimal
put 100 * tDecimal into tNew Decimal
put tNewDecimal
-- put the trunc of tNewDecimal
= 27
On May 19, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Peter T. Evensen wrote:
put 10.27 into tNumber
put the trunc of tNumber into tInteger
put tNumber - tInteger into tDecimal
put 100 * tDecimal into tNew Decimal
-- put tNewDecimal
put the trunc of tNewDecimal
= 26
I don't get it either.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Peter T. Evensen
http://www.PetersRoadToHealth.com
314-629-5248 or 888-682-4588
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
