Hi Kay,
Since it seems unlikely that I will get what I want, I am gradually
starting to use my own numeric dateTime format and conversion
routines: YYYYMMDD, HHMMSS or the 2 combined. As well as being totally
numeric which is great for sorting, they have the advantage of being
human-readable.
Isn't this just dateItems without the comas.
No, because dateItems works only for the 100-year period defined by the
centuryCutoff, whereas Sarah's "Julian date" approach is
centuryCutoff-independent.
Serendipity Library also includes Julian date handlers; but they don't
include time. I never could see the logic of working in seconds when
dealing with day increments.
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."
from "The Triple Foole" by John Donne (1572-1631)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
