On 27/05/2006, at 12:30, Kay C Lan wrote:
...
...BUT once you move
away from these, moving back to them using 'previous' or 'next'
will not
result in them be recognised, you need to try an move past them, then
they'll be recognised.
I recognise it but it leaves me thinking that the old names
"revdb_isbof" and "revdb_iseof" were more accurate descriptors than
the new synonyms"revCurrentRecordIsFirst" or
"revCurrentRecordIsLast". They could be changed to
"revNoPreviousRecord" and "revNoNextRecord" when they would fit their
dictionary descriptions. I will BugZilla it but somehow I do not see
this piece of documentation semantics hitting a high on their ToDo
list. It will just have to be rediscovered by new users as they reach
it.
cheers
David
HTH.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
