Mark Schonewille wrote:
Of course, if there is a firewall in place, it might render any check
for copies of the software on the network useless. There are
utilities such as LittleSnitch to prevent programmes from contacting
the network and the internet. That's why I wrote that there is a hack
for each protection measure --there really is. The question is how
much you want to invest in protection and how much others want to do
to override this protection.
That's a great question.
The original post might be rephrased to consider this wording:
What harm would there be in having a normal reg system that doesn't
attempt to shut down multiple local copies, puts that development time
into features and marketing, and reconsiders a greater investment in
anti-piracy technology down the road after there's a sizable installed base?
Most people who pirate software will never become customers anyway.
Taking funding away from customer-centric enhancements and marketing
rarely pays bigger dividends than focusing on the experience of the
legitimate user.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
___________________________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
