Can you imagine the outcry if Excel supported only 2000 rows? But the "real" limit is even lower when you consider the performance realities. Consider if you have a grid, 1000 rows of 20 columns, and you want to delete row 2 then you must somehow update 19,980 objects.
You could say, "Well, don't structure it that way. Use only the fields necessary for on-screen display." Unfortunately, once you are in the business of going into fields and setting them, Rev bogs down as well. What I arrived at was using a single field for each column, but it still is not as fast as deleting a line from a single field. Richard Gaskin wrote > It's worth noting that 32,806 is almost 38 feet at 72dpi, which is plenty > for most uses so I can't really call this a bug. and "640K should be enough for anyone" :D _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
