>> >I have been checking for images with any
>> >dimension greater than 4000 so that's probably a safe margin. However
>> >it sounds ...
>...snip...
>>... t worked with anything larger than 5 Mpx (2576x1932);but I
>>encountered no problems with MacOSX Rev v2.1.2 and WinXP Rev2.7.
>
>Try showing a really big image in an image object - you just get black
>& grey streaks but no error message when setting the filename of the
>image, which is a real problem.
My portfolio stack has a zoom in slider which displays a 5 Mpx jpeg
at full size--or at least that portion that fits within the stack's
rect and is not covered by an opaque mask.
It's related to the number of pixels rather than the size of the
image. I have a 3 MB JPG that's 6572 x 8293 pixels. That will not
display correctly and resizing the image object makes no difference.
However a 9 MB file that is only 3303 x 3015 pixels will display
perfectly. I want to do some tests to confirm the exact point at which
the problems occur: it does not fail just because one of the
dimensions is over 4096 pixels, as I can display an image that is 3048
x 9280. So the limiting factor must be the 2 dimensions multiplied.
I tried lowering the number of colors with the first image (6572 x
8293) and that made no difference, even when I went down to 256
colors.
Anyway Rob, you may want to add a check for large images to your
portfolio stack, as the result looks terrible if the image is too
large.
Cheers,
Sarah
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
