On Jul 2, 2006, at 9:22 PM, GregSmith wrote:

Though I've only been reading this forum for a short time, I've now got the definite impression that the Revolution environment is for developers - hard core developers . . . well, programmers - hard core programmers . . . not weak, infantile users like myself, who could never program their way out of a paper sack. O.K., I was profoundly mistaken in thinking there was any validity to creating simple, in-browser content made with Revolution. It is obviously a much more sophisticated tool intended for a much more
sophisticated audience.

I think you may have gotten the wrong impression; Revolution, while not HyperCard, is, IMHO, very usable by reasonably competent users as well as by "hard core programmers" to make what it was intended for, desktop software. I have no doubt that you could create a useful Rev stack in a short time if you decided you wanted to even if you have never written a program before. There is no doubt that Rev is a powerful environment that can and is used by sophisticated "hard core programmers" to create sophisticated software but that doesn't make it unusable by us lesser mortals.

However, Rev is not software for rendering "in-browser content." That's not what it's intended for. It might be very cool if someday someone created a browser plugin to render Rev window content in a browser but the fact that it is not available today does not mean that it is only intended for a "much more sophisticated audience." Nor does the fact that its programming language can be used by relatively sophisticated users for scripting CGI's mean that it's suitable for rendering html whether by hard core programmers or by weak, infantile users (although anyone who really is a weak, infantile user would be unlikely to have ever found there way here in the first place.)

In concluding that because Rev is not a good tool for creating simple, in-browser content and therefore it is only for hard core programmers, you are comparing apples and oranges. Such a conclusion makes no more sense that complaining than would condemning Word because it can't be used to do photoediting; there are lots of reasons to complain about Word but that would not be one of them.

Spence

James P. Spencer
Rochester, MN

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Badges??  We don't need no stinkin badges!"

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to